Miles Herman is a clever, understated lawyer who is at the top of his game.
It is true that they have had a number of high profile prosecutions which have failed, but it pays to take any investigation/prosecution by them VERY seriously.
As the primary regulator of fraud and corruption in the UK, the SFO employs a variety of investigative tools to expose illegal activities and subject them to the full force of the law.
They have now installed a new director and team, and have been given a little more funding to investigate the Libor scandal, so despite rumours that they may only have three more years to go, their investigations are likely to have real bite.
The SFO has strict statutory criteria which it must follow before it accepts a case to prosecute. In deciding on whether or not to mount a prosecution for one of these matters, the Director of the SFO will employ a multi-faceted approach and consider the merit of a prosecution in a number of ways, including whether:
The SFO will not mount an investigation pursuant to a prosecution unless it is confident that its efforts will result in a conviction. It is for this very reason that the SFO will work in partnership with a range of investigative and regulatory agencies, including the police and the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) to develop a robust basis to merit an investigation into potentially illegal activities.
It is paramount that anyone being investigated for being actively or passively involved in fraud or any other illegal behaviour consult with a law firm that understands the approach of the SFO in investigating and prosecuting these matters.
In short, the SFO investigates serious, complex frauds (with a value of over £1million) and, more recently, bribery and corruption. Unfortunately these crimes are not well understood and can easily be committed by people who do not understand how sophisticated the rules governing them are.
Policing against fraud is the traditional role of the SFO. Simply put, fraud is where someone acts in a deceptive way so to either cause someone else to suffer or for their own personal gain. The difficulty in understanding how the law on fraud operates is that it is framed in such a way to catch fraud in all forms, regardless as to how sophisticated it is – such that someone may not believe they are actually committing the offence.
A party will be vulnerable to an investigation for fraud not only where they actively give information that they know to be false, but also where they refuse to provide information they otherwise would or take active steps to abuse a position that they hold.
The crime of fraud carries with it significant penalties if a prosecution is successful. The severity of punishment will depend on whether an individual or an organisation is the subject of a prosecution: individuals found to have been involved in fraud can face a maximum of ten years imprisonment and an unlimited fine for their involvement; organisations on the other hand could suffer significant financial penalties if they are found to have been involved.
Bribery and corruption offences are newer additions to the SFO’s regulatory responsibilities and are, like fraud, very complex. Bribery is primarily governed by the Bribery Act 2010, which defines the offence, generally speaking, as someone giving an advantage – financial or otherwise – in order to motivate someone else to either: perform their duties in a way that is not the accepted norm; or, to reward them for having already done so.
It is often assumed that in the context of international business, UK legislation will not apply. This is a mistake: where an organisation has a commercial base in the UK it will be bound by UK law and liable for investigation and prosecution if it conducts bribery elsewhere in the world, regardless of how the offence is regulated in other countries where the organisation has business interests.
Corruption as an offence is also largely regulated by the Bribery Act 2010, but slightly more difficult to define, as the SFO itself has regularly pointed out. Simply put, corruption tends to involve the use of underhanded tactics in parties’ dealings with one another.
This can include: the provision of gifts following on from, or in advance of, a deal or decision being concluded; parties insisting on observing unusual practices when negotiating with one another; decisions being based on illogical or conflicting information; and standard procedures being avoided or manipulated.
Not unlike fraud, bribery carries with it significant penalties following a successful prosecution: imprisonment and financial sanctions for individuals and a potentially unlimited fine for companies.
What should you do once you have had notice that your case has been passed to the SFO, or if they have executed a dawn raid on your business?
Fortunately, you have found such a firm. We fulfil all the necessary criteria to defend or advise you (if you are a potential witness for the prosecution).
Our partner-led teams have thirty years of experience in defending complex fraud cases, many with a large international dimension. We employ our experience of working across jurisdictions in all cases being investigated by the SFO. Our multifaceted approach of involving specialist professionals to assist our client’s marks our Serious Fraud team out as a distinctive and progressive law firm that takes special care to protect our clients’ interests.
We structure our approach to SFO investigations and prosecutions in a way that insulates our client’s from the majority of the administrative and logistical issues, allowing them to concentrate on working directly with our specialist solicitors to formulate a strategy to deal with the investigation.
Penny Muir currently defends an individual facing a SFO prosecution alleging a £750 million Ponzi fraud. Siobhain Egan currently advises an individual who is the subject of a £multi-million, multi-jurisdictional pension Ponzi fraud. Keith Wood represented one of the individuals investigated in the SFO Kaupthing Bank inquiry.
We work nationally and, fee levels permitting, we will travel to meet with you. Our history of being the preferred legal advisor to many organisations and individuals on SFO investigations and prosecutions is a testament to our tenacity and knowledge of the law: we employ a pragmatic, practical approach to all dealings with the SFO and other regulatory authorities and will ensure that your interests are protected. It is vital that you are able to speak openly and frankly to your legal team, in order to benefit from advice that is tailored to meet your particular needs.
Please also refer to our Regulatory, Compliance & Professional Disciplinary Matters page and please refer to our case list to see some of our successful results in this field.
For further information or to speak to one of our top SFO solicitors please telephone us on 020 3411 1065, complete our online enquiry form, or contact Jeffrey Lewis, Siobhain Egan, Miles Herman, or Keith Wood. Do not hesitate to contact our team if you suspect that you may become the subject of an SFO investigation, or have already been notified that investigations underway. Your discussions with our fraud lawyers will be conducted under strict confidentiality, and any decision you take will be based on expert legal analysis and pragmatic, commercially oriented reasoning.
Book a
confidential
consultation
Miles Herman is a clever, understated lawyer who is at the top of his game.
Richard McConnell carried out conveyance for my family on 4 London flats, 1 sale and 3 purchases. In each instance he was excellent. The attention to detail and communication throughout the process was perfect. I have recommended Richard to several family members and friends who have been extremely pleased. I would have no hesitation in using Richard McConnell and Lewis Nedas in the future should the need arise.
I wanted to take the opportunity as well to thank you for everything that you have done on this case. The result that we got on Monday will have a massive positive impact not only on my life but the lives of all my family including that of my own son. I personally was struggling to hold back the tears when the sentence was being delivered by the judge and I know my father and sister felt the same too. It must be fantastic to work in a way that can have such a positive impact on people’s lives and I want you to know how much it all means to us all. Thanks a million and good luck with all that you do going forward.
Lewis Nedas advised me in a serious case of insider dealing. The lead solicitor dealing with my case was Jeffrey Lewis, who impressed me with his quick grasp of the very complex circumstances. His in-depth knowledge of how the City really works and his long experience of serious financial crime gave me great confidence. But it was also his friendly and supportive attitude, and readiness to take calls (or return them promptly if he was in court) which was very reassuring. I was delighted with the positive result of the case, and the speed and efficiency with which it was handled.
Lewis Nedas Law Limited, led by Jeffrey Lewis, is known as ‘an exceptional firm with a strong team of talented and expert criminal lawyers’. The practice offers a wide range of high-end legal services, including on cases concerning espionage, terrorism, and murder. Siobhain Egan has strong experience in multi-jurisdictional matters; recent highlight engagements concern organ trafficking and terrorism financing, among other matters. Unan Choudhury is noted for his work regarding espionage and murders, while Keith Wood is an expert in High Court contempt proceedings which arise from criminal activity. Other key figures include Miles Herman, who represents clients in complex litigations.
Hands on partner involvement leading a dynamic team who like to think out of the box. Results driven. Clear strategies. They can go toe to toe with the big “City” firms.