Miles Herman is a clever, understated lawyer who is at the top of his game.
A tenant (leaseholder) is almost always in a weaker bargaining position than their landlord (freeholder). In order to strengthen their position, tenants are afforded the statutory right to extend the duration of their leases, as well as collectively purchase the freehold interest in the property from the landlord.
There are two types of legal interest in real property: freehold and leasehold.
A freehold interest in property is outright ownership and lasts for as long as the owner wishes. As owners, they do not pay rent, and are responsible for upkeep of the premises, including structural maintenance. The landlord is also responsible for insuring the building.
A leasehold interest is a one agreed with the freehold interest holder of the property (the “landlord”). It affords the leaseholder the right to occupy and use the premises, alongside any further allowances or restrictions, known as covenants, agreed by the parties.
A typical leasehold/landlord relationship will divide right and responsibilities accordingly:
Most leases typically last between 90 and 999 years. Leases for a period of 21 or more years are known as “long” leases, while leases for a shorter duration are known as “short” leases. The reason for such lengthy periods is that the length is determinative of its value – a shorter lease will in turn result in a decreased value for its transfer to a new leaseholder. This diminution in value will continue as a lease moves towards its expiry date.
There are legislative protections for tenants who own certain leaseholds that are due to expire. This will occur where a tenant holds a long lease (21 years) that is reaching the end of its term, whether original or renewed.
If the leasehold interest is in a house, and is (1) held by the leaseholder as an original long lease that is (2) at least two years before expiry of its term, and (3) the leaseholder has held the lease for at least two years, the leaseholder may have a right to extend the lease by 50 years. If the landlord refuses to accept an offer, the dispute can be taken to court.
If the leasehold interest is in a flat, and is (1) held by the leaseholder as an original long lease that is (2) at least two years before expiry of its term, and (3) the current leaseholder has held the lease for at least two years, the leaseholder may have a right to extend the lease by 90 years. The tenant will have to pay a premium for this extension. If the landlord refuses to accept an offer, they dispute can be taken to court.
Under the Leasehold Reform Housing and Urban Development Act 1993, tenants have a right to jointly purchase the freehold interest of their building from the landlord. This is often done through formation of a limited company, of which the tenants are shareholders, providing them combined control over the property as a freehold interest. This provides tenants control over rent, maintenance and insurance. In turn, the tenants will continue to have a leasehold interest, but it will be in agreement with their newly formed company, which owns the freehold interest.
There are certain criteria tenants must meet in order to use the right to collective enfranchisement:
Granted the requisite number of tenants agree to initiate, the collective enfranchisement process is commenced through service of notice on the landlord, who will typically have two months to respond to the notice. The landlord has the option of accepting the notice, or contesting it via counter-notice. The landlord can contest the acquisition on the basis of (1) they disagree with its terms or (2) the tenants are not eligible for the acquisition.
If the landlord opts to contest the acquisition, and no agreement is reached within two months of the counter notice, the case must be brought before the First Tier Tribunal; no later than six months from the landlord’s initial issuance of counter-notice. Failure to adhere to the deadline will result in a further claim being barred for one year. The First Tier Tribunal will make a determination regarding the terms of the agreement in dispute, or whether the tenants are eligible.
If either party wishes to appeal this determination, they may do so to the Lands Tribunal.
The combined purchasing power of the tenants allows them to acquire a freehold interest in the premise at minimal cost, and with it the ability to set their own rent, maintenance costs, insurance and extend the length of their leaseholds.
Calculation the cost of acquiring the freehold is a complex process. It will include surveyor’s fees, the costs of establishing a company and any applicable tax. If the case must be referred to the First Tier Tribunal, these costs will also have to be carried by the tenants.
In some cases, the landlord may wish to include restrictive covenants when transferring the freehold lease to the tenants. Any such covenants must be agreed upon with the tenants, or where no agreement can be reached, subject to approval by the First Tier Tribunal.
If a tenant wishes to engage a right to either extend their lease or enter into a collective enfranchisement, it is vital that they are aware of their rights and the costs that either process entails.
At Lewis Nedas, our team of Property Litigation Solicitors have broad experience in both commercial and residential property litigation. We have successfully advised landlords and tenants with highly complex and multi-faceted cases. To speak with one of our Property Lawyers, please contact us on 020 7387 2032 or complete our online enquiry form.
Book a
confidential
consultation
Miles Herman is a clever, understated lawyer who is at the top of his game.
Richard McConnell carried out conveyance for my family on 4 London flats, 1 sale and 3 purchases. In each instance he was excellent. The attention to detail and communication throughout the process was perfect. I have recommended Richard to several family members and friends who have been extremely pleased. I would have no hesitation in using Richard McConnell and Lewis Nedas in the future should the need arise.
I wanted to take the opportunity as well to thank you for everything that you have done on this case. The result that we got on Monday will have a massive positive impact not only on my life but the lives of all my family including that of my own son. I personally was struggling to hold back the tears when the sentence was being delivered by the judge and I know my father and sister felt the same too. It must be fantastic to work in a way that can have such a positive impact on people’s lives and I want you to know how much it all means to us all. Thanks a million and good luck with all that you do going forward.
Lewis Nedas advised me in a serious case of insider dealing. The lead solicitor dealing with my case was Jeffrey Lewis, who impressed me with his quick grasp of the very complex circumstances. His in-depth knowledge of how the City really works and his long experience of serious financial crime gave me great confidence. But it was also his friendly and supportive attitude, and readiness to take calls (or return them promptly if he was in court) which was very reassuring. I was delighted with the positive result of the case, and the speed and efficiency with which it was handled.
Lewis Nedas Law Limited, led by Jeffrey Lewis, is known as ‘an exceptional firm with a strong team of talented and expert criminal lawyers’. The practice offers a wide range of high-end legal services, including on cases concerning espionage, terrorism, and murder. Siobhain Egan has strong experience in multi-jurisdictional matters; recent highlight engagements concern organ trafficking and terrorism financing, among other matters. Unan Choudhury is noted for his work regarding espionage and murders, while Keith Wood is an expert in High Court contempt proceedings which arise from criminal activity. Other key figures include Miles Herman, who represents clients in complex litigations.
Hands on partner involvement leading a dynamic team who like to think out of the box. Results driven. Clear strategies. They can go toe to toe with the big “City” firms.