Miles Herman is a clever, understated lawyer who is at the top of his game.
The EAT has jurisdiction to hear appeals on points of law, procedural unfairness, bias and improper conduct on part of the employment tribunal judge. For an appeal on a point of law, it is not sufficient to argue that a different decision should have been arrived at. The EAT cannot review findings of fact by the employment tribunal, and will in almost all cases refuse to consider fresh evidence.
An appeal is brought through submission of a Notice of Appeal to the EAT, which clearly states the points of law upon which the appeal is grounded. An appeal cannot be grounded on general contentions, known as “perversity appeals”, such as that the judgement was contrary to the evidence or that the judgment was unreasonable.
As with proceedings before the employment tribunal, the EAT will encourage the parties to enter into alternative dispute resolution, which in nearly all cases must be considered again at the appeal stage. The EAT judge may direct the parties to enter conciliation and report on steps made towards settlement.
A Notice of Appeal must be received by the EAT within 42 days from the date of receipt of the written reasons for the employment tribunal’s decision, or, if written reasons were not requested, 42 days from the tribunal’s judgment.
The EAT may waive these time limits if good reasons are provided. These do not generally include awaiting approval for public funds for litigation or that negotiations between the parties are ongoing.
In 2017, the UK’s Supreme Court held that the then compulsory fee structure for making a claim to the employment tribunal or Employment Appeal Tribunal was unlawful. The effect of this decision was to revert the system back to its pre-2013 status, which made it free to bring a claim before the employment tribunals.
It is imperative to note that free access to the Employment Appeal Tribunal does not prevent an adverse cost award being made against a claimant if they should lose their appeal against their employer.
If a party feels they have viable grounds for appeal, they can appeal a decision of the EAT to the English & Welsh Court of Appeal.
Book a
confidential
consultation
Miles Herman is a clever, understated lawyer who is at the top of his game.
Richard McConnell carried out conveyance for my family on 4 London flats, 1 sale and 3 purchases. In each instance he was excellent. The attention to detail and communication throughout the process was perfect. I have recommended Richard to several family members and friends who have been extremely pleased. I would have no hesitation in using Richard McConnell and Lewis Nedas in the future should the need arise.
I wanted to take the opportunity as well to thank you for everything that you have done on this case. The result that we got on Monday will have a massive positive impact not only on my life but the lives of all my family including that of my own son. I personally was struggling to hold back the tears when the sentence was being delivered by the judge and I know my father and sister felt the same too. It must be fantastic to work in a way that can have such a positive impact on people’s lives and I want you to know how much it all means to us all. Thanks a million and good luck with all that you do going forward.
Lewis Nedas advised me in a serious case of insider dealing. The lead solicitor dealing with my case was Jeffrey Lewis, who impressed me with his quick grasp of the very complex circumstances. His in-depth knowledge of how the City really works and his long experience of serious financial crime gave me great confidence. But it was also his friendly and supportive attitude, and readiness to take calls (or return them promptly if he was in court) which was very reassuring. I was delighted with the positive result of the case, and the speed and efficiency with which it was handled.
Lewis Nedas Law Limited, led by Jeffrey Lewis, is known as ‘an exceptional firm with a strong team of talented and expert criminal lawyers’. The practice offers a wide range of high-end legal services, including on cases concerning espionage, terrorism, and murder. Siobhain Egan has strong experience in multi-jurisdictional matters; recent highlight engagements concern organ trafficking and terrorism financing, among other matters. Unan Choudhury is noted for his work regarding espionage and murders, while Keith Wood is an expert in High Court contempt proceedings which arise from criminal activity. Other key figures include Miles Herman, who represents clients in complex litigations.
Hands on partner involvement leading a dynamic team who like to think out of the box. Results driven. Clear strategies. They can go toe to toe with the big “City” firms.
