GET 24/7 LEGAL ADVICE

020 7387 2032

When raising a claim in court, a number of procedural hurdles provided by the Civil Procedure Rules must be adhered to. Failure to conform to these rules may result in a claim failing from the outset.

Initiating a claim

First and foremost, a plaintiff must have (1) a cause of action recognised by law; and (2) establish the factual basis to support their claim. Both grounds will form the basis of the claim, detailed on the Claim Form, which is submitted to the court alongside the requisite fee. The court will in turn issue a Claim Form which is to be served on all defendants in accordance with the statutorily prescribed time limits.

A defendant will then have the choice of filing their defence within 14 days of service upon them, or admitting to all or part of the claims.

It must be noted that certain pre-action protocols apply to civil litigants, which encourage parties to share information and seek settlement, usually by mediation or arbitration, before proceeding to a full trial.

Are representative parties permitted?

A claim may be brought by a plaintiff who is considered to “have the same interest” in a claim as persons they are representing.

Which court is appropriate for bringing proceedings?

In England and Wales, county courts have similar jurisdiction to the High Court. However, beyond the following claims must be brought in the High Court:

  • if the value of the claim is anticipated to be higher than £100,000; and
  • if the claim is for personal injury, where the value is £50,000 or higher.

 

Summary judgement 

If the plaintiff believes the defendant’s filed defence has “no real prospect of success”, they may file for summary judgement. The test determined by the court is whether there is a chance the defendant’s case would succeed, and the burden of proof rests with the plaintiff to show otherwise. The defendant must submit evidence supporting the viability of their defence no less than seven days prior to the summary judgement hearing.

The effect of a summary judgement is the defendant’s defence is struck out without resort to a full trial.

Case management

During the case management process, the court holds a hearing to consider the issues in dispute and whether or not the parties are better served by entering Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) instead. The court will also determine a timeline for the claim to proceed and the rules for disclosure of evidence.

Contact our Dispute Resolution Solicitors in Mayfair and throughout London

Raising a claim in adherence to Civil Procedure Rules is vital for protecting a right of action, as statutory limitations present a definitive barrier to bringing legal action, and contractual limitations can render time constraints even tighter.

Lewis Nedas Law holds over 40 years of corporate litigation experience with both domestic and international clients in a broad range of matters, from preliminary trial proceedings through to post-trial.

For expert advice from our Dispute Resolution Solicitors, please call us on 020 7387 2032 or complete our online enquiry form.

key contacts

Please let us know your name.
Please let us know your email address.
Please enter a valid phone number
Invalid Input
Please let us know your message.
GDPR Agreement - I consent to the information supplied above to be stored on this website so that Lewis Nedas Law can respond to my enquiry.
Invalid Input

Top Ranked Lawyers: Legal 500 

Celebrating 40 years of practice in 2022, we are leaders in criminal defence, serious fraud, serious crime and many other areas of legal practice. We have been involved in many leading cases over the last 40+ years and are well known for our genuinely high acquittal rate and overall success rate. Please click the Legal 500 logo below for more information about our rankings.

We are happy to help

Get 24/7 Legal Advice, call

020 7387 2032

“I was put in touch with Lewis Nedas Law through a mutual friend and I was not disappointed. The team were nothing but straight forward, honest and realistic about the nature of my case and the expected outcome from the minute I got in contact and were willing to take over from the previous company at very short notice. With their unrivalled experience and expertise in their profession the outcome was even better than expected and I couldn’t recommend them enough.”


Accreditations and Awards

  • Legal 500 uk leading firm 2024
  • The Times Best Law Firms 2024
  • Legal 500 uk leading firm 2022 50x73
  • The Times Best Law Firms 2022
  • Google 5 stars