020 7387 2032

When defending a claim in court, a number of procedural hurdles provided by the Civil Procedure Rules have to be adhered to. Failure to conform to these rules may result in a defence failing from the outset.

Responding to receipt of a Claim Form

On receipt of a Claim Form, known as “service” signalling a plaintiff has raised on action against them, a defendant has the option of admitting the basis of the claim or defending it in whole or in part.

  • A defendant who wishes to defend the claim against them, either in whole or in part, must file their defence within 14 days of receipt of service. If they are unable to file a defence within this window, they must file an acknowledgment of service, after which they have another 28 days to file their defence.
  • If the defendant wishes to admit the claim alleged against them, either in whole or in part, they must file an admission.


In accordance with the Civil Procedure Rules, once an admission has been filed, the claimant obtains a right to enter judgment against them. The defendant can request a time period in which to pay the sums claimed. An admission can only be subsequently withdrawn with permission of the court.

Default judgement

If the defendant fails to file a defence, the claimant may be able to obtain a default judgment against them. A default judgement can be set aside if the defendant is able to successfully claim they were unaware of proceedings.


If a defendant wishes to make a counterclaim against the plaintiff, they must either file it alongside their defence or seek permission from the court if the time period for filing defences has expired. Where a counterclaim is sought against a party other than the plaintiff, they must seek leave from the court to have that party added to the case.

Summary judgment 

If the defendant believes the plaintiff’s claim filed has “no real prospect of success”, they may file for summary judgement. The test determined by the court is whether there is a chance the plaintiff’s claim would succeed, and the burden of proof rests with the defendant to show otherwise. The plaintiff must submit evidence supporting the viability of their defence no less than seven days prior to the summary judgement hearing.

The effect of a successful summary judgment is the plaintiff’s claim is struck out without proceeding to a full trial.

Case management

During the case management process, the court holds a hearing to consider the issues in dispute and whether or not the parties are better served by entering Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR). The court will also determine a timeline for the case to proceed and set the rules for disclosure of evidence.

Contact our Dispute Resolution Solicitors in Mayfair and throughout London

Lewis Nedas Law holds over 40 years of corporate litigation experience with both domestic and international clients in a broad range of matters, from preliminary trial proceedings through to post-trial.

For expert advice from our Dispute Resolution Solicitors, please call us on 020 7387 2032 or complete our online enquiry form.

key contacts

Please let us know your name.
Please let us know your email address.
Please enter a valid phone number
Invalid Input
Please let us know your message.
GDPR Agreement - I consent to the information supplied above to be stored on this website so that Lewis Nedas Law can respond to my enquiry.
Invalid Input

Top Ranked Lawyers: Legal 500 

Celebrating 40 years of practice in 2022, we are leaders in criminal defence, serious fraud, serious crime and many other areas of legal practice. We have been involved in many leading cases over the last 40+ years and are well known for our genuinely high acquittal rate and overall success rate. Please click the Legal 500 logo below for more information about our rankings.

We are happy to help

Get 24/7 Legal Advice, call

020 7387 2032

“I was put in touch with Lewis Nedas Law through a mutual friend and I was not disappointed. The team were nothing but straight forward, honest and realistic about the nature of my case and the expected outcome from the minute I got in contact and were willing to take over from the previous company at very short notice. With their unrivalled experience and expertise in their profession the outcome was even better than expected and I couldn’t recommend them enough.”

Accreditations and Awards

  • Legal 500 uk leading firm 2024
  • The Times Best Law Firms 2024
  • Legal 500 uk leading firm 2022 50x73
  • The Times Best Law Firms 2022
  • Google 5 stars