GET 24/7 LEGAL ADVICE

020 7387 2032

Where parties anticipate entering litigation, in England & Wales there is a range of pre-action rules they must comply with or else they could face sanction later in the course of proceedings, most often in the form of adverse cost orders.

What are the rules governing pre-action conduct?

Pre-action conduct is governed by the Practice Direction on Protocols and the Practice Direction on Pre-Action Conduct and Protocols (PDPACP). The objectives of the protocols in both instruments are, first and foremost, to encourage parties to avoid litigation and approach it as a last resort. Instead, settlement should be reached at the earliest stage possible.

The Practice Directions place emphasis on parties reaching consensus and arriving at decisions on their own without recourse to courts, typically through Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR). Information sharing, subject to confidentiality agreements, is provided as a means of swiftly reaching settlement.

Are pre-action protocols industry specific?

There is a range of pre-action protocols tailored to certain industries, including personal injury, professional negligence, torts, construction, judicial review and housing and landlord disputes.

The Directives understand that following set protocols may not be appropriate in all circumstances, for example certain disclosures over freezing orders and where parties are constrained by statutory time limits for bringing action. As a general rule, parties to a dispute cannot be ordered by a court into ADR, unless a specific provision for ADR exists in the parties’ contract.

How are costs considered to have been appropriately reduced?

The PDPACP places a particular emphasis on cost reduction where possible, and adds a proportionality test for pre-action costs incurred: that they must be “reasonable and proportionate” in order to resolve factual and legal issues. If costs are considered to be disproportionate, recovery will be denied when costs are ordered in court.

The benefits of compliance with pre-action protocols, and ultimately avoiding litigation, are that the parties have control over costs, rather than relinquish control to a judicial body. However, if considerable expense is made to comply with pre-action protocols, a drawback is that through avoiding litigation a court order to recover those costs for the successful party cannot be obtained.

What are the sanctions for non-compliance?

Where a party does not comply with the applicable pre-action protocols, the court has discretion to deny costs, vary the interest on costs ordered to be paid or delay recovery of costs. If a party fails to comply with a court order during litigation proceedings and is sanctioned, the court may take into account that party’s compliance with pre-action protocols when reaching its decision on whether to reduce the sanction imposed.

Contact our Pre-Action Protocol Solicitors in Mayfair and throughout London

Lewis Nedas Law has over 25 years of corporate litigation experience with both domestic and international clients in a broad range of matters, including using ADR to reach a successful out-of-court settlement. For expert advice from our Dispute Resolution Solicitors, please call us on 020 7387 2032 or complete our online enquiry form.

Please let us know your name.
Please let us know your email address.
Please enter a valid phone number
Invalid Input
Please let us know your message.
Invalid Input

Top Ranked Lawyers: Legal 500 

Celebrating our 30th anniversary in 2012, we are leaders in criminal defence, serious fraud, serious crime and many other areas of legal practice. We have been involved in many leading cases over the last 30 years and are well known for our genuinely high acquittal rate and overall success rate. Please click the Legal 500 logo below for more information about our rankings.

We are happy to help

Get 24/7 Legal Advice, call

020 7387 2032

“I was put in touch with Lewis Nedas Law through a mutual friend and I was not disappointed. The team were nothing but straight forward, honest and realistic about the nature of my case and the expected outcome from the minute I got in contact and were willing to take over from the previous company at very short notice. With their unrivalled experience and expertise in their profession the outcome was even better than expected and I couldn’t recommend them enough.”


Accreditations and Awards

  • Google 5 stars