Miles Herman is a clever, understated lawyer who is at the top of his game.
There are concerns of a “two-tier” system of justice where those with private funding can prosecute a case that the State has decided not to pursue.
The statutory right to bring a private prosecution is valuable and many private prosecutions that are brought and properly managed. However, there are differences between private and State-brought prosecutions. In private prosecutions, the checks and balances are not necessarily as stringent in these cases, particularly in relation to disclosure and witnesses.
Although the process is supposed to be the same for a private prosecution as for a State one, there are features unique to a private prosecution that a defendant may be able to challenge. Here, our criminal defence lawyers look what these challenges are.
Private prosecutions are not brought by the Crown or any other statutory prosecuting authority, for example, the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS), but can be brought by any individual or company under s6(1) Prosecution of Offences Act 1985. The way that a private prosecution is dealt with is the same as any other case; it is just that the State does not bring it.
The CPS does not have to be notified of a private prosecution by the private prosecutor. The CPS may find out about a private prosecution through other means, for example, if they are asked to take over the prosecution by either the private prosecutor or the defendant.
Under section 6(2) of the Prosecution of Offences Act 1985, the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) can take over private prosecution proceedings.
Full Code Test
For the DPP to decide whether or not to take over a case, it must apply the Full Code Test. There are two limbs to this test:
Evidential stage
The DPP will discontinue the case when the evidential test for the CPS Code for Crown Prosecutors is not met. The DPP will determine this if there is no realistic prospect that the defendant will be convicted. The DPP must consider the likelihood of conviction looking at all available evidence to the DPP, including other State investigations that were performed before these proceedings and the defence case.
Public interest stage
The circumstances in which the public interest test will not be satisfied are likely to be relatively narrow and are limited to specific circumstances; however, it is a stage that must be fulfilled. The CPS considers a fundamental stage in establishing the legitimacy of a prosecution. It reserves the right to dismiss a case if there are grounds to believe that the reason for prosecution is malicious in intent or can be viewed as a misuse of the judicial process.
The DPP can also take over a case in order to stop it where, for example, it interferes with an investigation or prosecution that already exists or where the prosecution is vexatious or malicious. The conduct of the private prosecutor is something that should be considered by the defence. For example, if other legal proceedings stated that no summons or arrest warrant should be issued, then the current proceedings could be in breach of these undertakings.
It may also be possible to state that there has been an abuse of process where the private prosecutor’s conduct has been unfair or unconscionable. A significant issue with private prosecutions relates to disclosure. It is often the case that the person bringing the private prosecution also has the vital evidence to support the case and so can control what information is passed onto the defence team.
The defence team must ensure that the private prosecutor has complied with disclosure requirements, including its duty to obtain relevant material from third parties and the disclosure of unused material.
It may be the case that important documentation is not passed on if the person bringing the private prosecution is not being completely transparent. There is no one assigned to ensure that documentation and information on computers is correctly shared. It is therefore vital for anyone facing a private prosecution to alert their lawyers to any information that they believe to be in existence that is relevant but has not been disclosed. It is possible to apply to the courts to ensure that disclosure is carried out correctly and in full and if this is not followed, then the courts can be asked to stay the proceedings.
Witnesses
Another point that is typical with private prosecutions is that the person bringing the proceedings is likely to be the principal witness for the case. Their lawyer will have to handle the balancing act of thoroughly discussing the case with them in relation to the best tactics but avoid discussing certain issues relating to them being a witness, as would arise in a State prosecution, thus creating a complicated relationship.
If you are facing a private prosecution, then you need specialist legal advice to ensure the best outcome for your case. These are complicated cases that need to be handled carefully to ensure that you are not placed at an unfair advantage. Our expert team can guide and advise you to make sure that your rights are protected. Please contact our expert team of criminal defence lawyers via our online enquiry form or telephone us on 020 7387 2032.
Top Ranked Lawyers: Legal 500
Celebrating 39 years of practice in 2021, we are leaders in criminal defence, serious fraud, serious crime and many other areas of legal practice. We have been involved in many leading cases over the last 35+ years and are well known for our genuinely high acquittal rate and overall success rate. Please click the Legal 500 logo below for more information about our rankings.
Book a
confidential
consultation
Miles Herman is a clever, understated lawyer who is at the top of his game.
Richard McConnell carried out conveyance for my family on 4 London flats, 1 sale and 3 purchases. In each instance he was excellent. The attention to detail and communication throughout the process was perfect. I have recommended Richard to several family members and friends who have been extremely pleased. I would have no hesitation in using Richard McConnell and Lewis Nedas in the future should the need arise.
I wanted to take the opportunity as well to thank you for everything that you have done on this case. The result that we got on Monday will have a massive positive impact not only on my life but the lives of all my family including that of my own son. I personally was struggling to hold back the tears when the sentence was being delivered by the judge and I know my father and sister felt the same too. It must be fantastic to work in a way that can have such a positive impact on people’s lives and I want you to know how much it all means to us all. Thanks a million and good luck with all that you do going forward.
Lewis Nedas advised me in a serious case of insider dealing. The lead solicitor dealing with my case was Jeffrey Lewis, who impressed me with his quick grasp of the very complex circumstances. His in-depth knowledge of how the City really works and his long experience of serious financial crime gave me great confidence. But it was also his friendly and supportive attitude, and readiness to take calls (or return them promptly if he was in court) which was very reassuring. I was delighted with the positive result of the case, and the speed and efficiency with which it was handled.
Lewis Nedas Law Limited, led by Jeffrey Lewis, is known as ‘an exceptional firm with a strong team of talented and expert criminal lawyers’. The practice offers a wide range of high-end legal services, including on cases concerning espionage, terrorism, and murder. Siobhain Egan has strong experience in multi-jurisdictional matters; recent highlight engagements concern organ trafficking and terrorism financing, among other matters. Unan Choudhury is noted for his work regarding espionage and murders, while Keith Wood is an expert in High Court contempt proceedings which arise from criminal activity. Other key figures include Miles Herman, who represents clients in complex litigations.
Hands on partner involvement leading a dynamic team who like to think out of the box. Results driven. Clear strategies. They can go toe to toe with the big “City” firms.
