A) represented a defendant who was one of 25 arrestees in a large complex undercover drugs supply prosecution in the South East. The Sentencing Guidelines indicated a sentence of between 6-7 years, as a result of excellent mitigation and advocacy skills, our client received a sentence of 33 months imprisonment.
B) represented a client who pleaded guilty in the Crown Court to an allegation of conspiring to defraud, a number of older people of their life savings whilst pretending to be a serving police officer. This is a topical offence, which is viewed very seriously by the Courts (and the general public ) and again would ordinarily have attracted a lengthy custodial sentence, however as a result of detailed preparation and mitigation our client received a community order.
A) represents an individual facing a large VAT fraud involving Interpol and prosecution authorities in Poland and Holland
B) also represents a legal professional facing contempt proceedings brought by the SRA (Solicitors Regulation Authority)
C) successfully represented a client who pleaded guilty to an allegation of rape, who was sentenced to 20 months imprisonment. Sean collated a mass of detailed mitigation to place before the Court upon the client's behalf, which persuaded the Judge to hand down a much lower sentence than the Sentencing Guidelines indicate.
A) a defendant facing a large multi defendant conspiracy to supply Class A drugs and Modern Slavery Act offences (County lines prosecution)
B) advises a client who is the subject of a police investigating conspiracy to defraud involving numerous leasehold transactions
C) advises an Oxford professional subject to allegations of Historic rape and sexual assault, pending charge
D) represents a member of the Military at Military Court facing contraventions of standing orders and Military law
E) represents another member of the Military, facing allegations of assault at Military Court
F) represents an individual facing allegations of Historic rape at the Crown Court
G) represents another client facing both Modern Slavery act offences and Conspiracy to supply class A ( County lines prosecution)
H) represents yet another defendant facing trial and allegations of conspiring to supply class A drugs.
A) secured the acquittal of a defendant who faced trial following an allegation of possession of a firearm with intent to endanger life (after having entered an early guilty plea to lesser offences)
B) represents a defendant defending trial on indictment - conspiracy to supply class A drugs
C) a client awaiting trial (NCA prosecution) money laundering
A) a doctor facing an investigation into his use of child porn found upon his home computer
B) a City trader accused of rape and sexual assault by a co- worker .
Celebrating 40 years of practice in 2022, we are leaders in criminal defence, serious fraud, serious crime and many other areas of legal practice. We have been involved in many leading cases over the last 40+ years and are well known for our genuinely high acquittal rate and overall success rate. Please click the Legal 500 logo below for more information about our rankings.